On October 10, 2025, President Donald Trump, now 79, underwent a “routine yearly checkup” at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center—just six months after his last physical. The White House memo from physician Capt. Sean Barbabella painted a glowing picture: Trump is in “exceptional health,” with a “cardiac age” 14 years younger than his chronological one, normal heart function, and no signs of serious illness.
He even received a flu shot and an updated COVID-19 booster in preparation for foreign travel. At 6’3” and 224 pounds, his doctor touted an “active lifestyle” including golf as a key to his vitality.
This report arrives amid visible health concerns that contradict the upbeat narrative. Photographs from recent months show swollen ankles and leg swelling, later diagnosed as chronic venous insufficiency—a condition where leg veins fail to efficiently return blood to the heart, causing pooling and edema.
Bruising on Trump’s right hand, often concealed with makeup, was attributed to “frequent handshaking” combined with daily low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prevention—a blood thinner that heightens bleeding risk, especially in older adults with potential liver strain over time.
Trump’s body mass index hovers around 28, classifying him as overweight, a known risk factor for both venous issues and broader cardiovascular strain.
Yet the memo glosses over these realities, declaring him “fully fit” without addressing how obesity and aspirin use might exacerbate bruising or long-term organ stress. This raises a stark question: Does this evaluation reflect massive ignorance and incompetence in presidential healthcare, or is it a calculated public relations stunt to project unyielding strength? History and emerging data suggest the latter, with Trump’s age and the high-stakes optics of his office amplifying the stakes.
The Health Realities Buried in the Report
Trump’s documented issues aren’t minor footnotes. Chronic venous insufficiency affects up to 35% of older adults, particularly those overweight or with sedentary habits, and can signal underlying vascular problems if unmanaged.
Aspiring for heart health—while prudent given his history of high cholesterol—thins blood but risks easy bruising and gastrointestinal or liver complications with prolonged use, especially in someone not engaging in rigorous exercise beyond golf.
The April 2025 physical already noted “well-controlled” cholesterol but omitted deeper cardiovascular screenings, fueling skepticism.
More troubling is the endorsement of vaccinations. The flu shot and COVID-19 booster were administered during the visit, aligning with standard protocols. But recent data challenges their blanket efficacy. A Cleveland Clinic study of over 53,000 employees during the 2024-2025 season found vaccinated individuals had a 27% higher risk of influenza infection compared to unvaccinated ones, yielding a negative vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%—far beyond typical margins of error.
While the Clinic clarified this doesn’t mean the vaccine *causes* flu (it uses inactivated virus), the association persists, possibly due to behavioral factors or strain mismatches.
For COVID boosters, 2024-2025 interim estimates show 33% effectiveness against emergency visits and 45-46% against hospitalizations in older adults—modest at best, waning quickly atop widespread prior immunity.
VAERS, the U.S. vaccine adverse event reporting system, logs thousands of COVID-19 shot side effects, from myocarditis to blood clots.
Manufacturers enjoy liability immunity under the PREP Act, a wartime-era shield extended to COVID vaccines, removing financial incentives for ultra-safe formulations and raising ethical red flags about informed consent.
Critics argue this fostered rushed development, evident in early data: Influenza deaths plummeted 90-99% in 2020-2022 due to lockdowns, while COVID deaths surged, prompting claims of diagnostic reclassification—labeling flu-like cases as COVID to inflate pandemic numbers and justify measures.
This isn’t conspiracy; it’s a documented shift in coding practices, eroding trust in public health data.
For a 79-year-old with Trump’s profile, these interventions may do more harm than good—blind adherence to protocols without personalized risk assessment screams either medical complacency or deliberate spin.
Ignorance, Incompetence, or Stunt? The Boomer Blind Spot vs. Historical Precedent
Option one: Trump, the quintessential Baby Boomer, is simply out of touch. Born in 1946, he embodies a generation raised on trust-the-doctor paternalism, ignoring data that vaccines aren’t panaceas. Overweight, on blood thinners, and pushing 80, he might follow White House protocols without question, his team too sycophantic to push back. This incompetence—failing to tailor care to his realities—endangers not just him but sets a poor example for millions.
But the PR stunt theory fits better, echoing presidential history. Franklin D. Roosevelt, paralyzed at 39 in 1921, was publicly diagnosed with polio but likely suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome—an autoimmune reaction causing symmetric paralysis, not the asymmetric wasting of polio.
FDR concealed his wheelchair use, projecting vigor through staged photos and speeches, all while founding the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (now March of Dimes). Joe Biden’s cognitive lapses were similarly downplayed until undeniable, with aides scripting appearances to mask decline.
Trump’s team, fresh off a contentious election, has every motive to release a sanitized memo: It quells voter doubts, burnishes his “superhuman” image, and preempts scrutiny before travel.
Why a stunt? The timing—mere months after the last exam—reeks of optics, not necessity.
No raw data, like full labs or imaging, was shared, mirroring past vagueness.
Saline placeholders for vaccines? Not implausible—rumors swirled around elite exemptions during the pandemic. Even if not, the “exceptional health” phrasing feels scripted, ignoring how his conditions could worsen with age.
A Call for Transparency in the Twilight of Power
Trump’s evaluation isn’t just a personal health note; it’s a symptom of systemic opacity in presidential care. If ignorance drives it, we need independent oversight. If a stunt, it erodes faith in institutions already frayed by pandemic mistrust. Either way, the public deserves unvarnished truth—full disclosures, not feel-good memos. At 79, Trump has earned candor, not coddling. As data mounts on vaccine limits and reclassification pitfalls, blindly promoting boosters risks real harm. History warns: Concealment serves egos, not empires. Let’s hope this “exceptional” report marks a turning point toward honesty, before the next photo tells the untold story.
I wrote this poem from a quiet place within… a place that still believes a single smile can soften the hardest day.
If these words touched your heart, made you smile, or reminded you of hope, I’d be truly grateful if you support my work. 🌷
You can do that by becoming a paid subscriber or buying me a coffee …every bit of love helps me keep creating and sharing more heartfelt poetry with you.
https://open.substack.com/pub/hinagondal/p/when-smiles-touch-the-soul?r=61i45v&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Well written!