Jane Doe has filed a civil petition against 7 Cornell Students, Cornell University, and a Local Bar. She claims she was involved in a Non-Consensual ‘Group Project’ from October of 2024.
Going back to the initial situation — The District Attorney found unsubstantial evidence to move forward with criminal charges.
According to Jane Doe’s OWN statements, the ‘Group Project’, at first, was Consensual. Multiple Parties were intoxicated, conscious, and providing the ability to actively consent or not consent during the encounter.
If this were a situation where only Jane Doe was intoxicated, and other Parties were of sound mind, this would be a different outcome.
Because of Equality Under The Law, we would have to zero out the situation, UNLESS, we decide to always paint The Woman as a Victim in situations like this. If that becomes Precedent, we would also need to consider in adjustment in Agency and decision-making capability.
The Lives of these men, if we go with the idea this was a Consensual Activity, have already had their lives forever ruined. If they’re Guilty, and there’s evidence to substantiate that, criminally prosecute them. If not, they’ve been defamed beyond repair.
The moral of the story — We need to teach our boys and girls to NOT be part of any morally reprehensible situation, regardless of Consent. All it invites is bad outcomes and unnecessary liability.
